What you see always depends on what you are looking at.
Me, I'm a big picture guy, not someone who focuses on details.
Sometimes that's a good thing, sometimes it's not.
It's good because I tend not to sweat the small stuff.
It's bad for detail-oriented work, like writing or art-making, where getting the details just right matters so much.
Even before trump was first voted into office, from my big-picture perch I saw the potential for disaster.
Disaster because he was so obviously inexperienced, and so clearly temperamentally unfit to wield so much power.
Disaster because he had no appreciation for institutions or the international alliances he was inheriting.
Worse than indifference, his instinct seemed destructive. He appeared to want to tear down the foundations of American democracy and dismantle the network of alliances and organizations that had maintained global stability since the end of WWII.
The fact that he was new to the job — and not particularly competent or disciplined — limited the damage he could do in his first term.
Having experienced trump version 1.0, I never imagined Americans would choose him a second time. Especially after January 6th.
I was wrong.
It turns out Americans have very short memories.
The second term has confirmed my worst fears. This time, with a compliant and subservient Congress, he is largely unleashed to use the powers of the presidency according to his whims.
My sense was that his first priority in a second term — now that he understood the levers of power — would be to enrich himself, his family, and his friends.
And Americans would pay for it in spades.
The tariffs fit under that heading. So do the lawsuits against corporations, law firms, and universities aimed at extracting settlements. The “gifts” from foreign leaders. The cryptocurrency ventures. The project-fundraising grifts. The selling pardons. And most recently, the war profiteering — seizing Venezuela’s oil and launching a drone business.
The second priority would be the only other thing he truly craves: attention, fame, legacy.
Hence the constant television appearances, sometimes twice a day. Dominating headlines. Putting his name and face on prominent government buildings. Erecting monuments to himself — the ballroom, the victory arch. His obsessive pursuit of the Nobel Peace Prize.
But it also extends to more ominous gestures: the abduction of a government leader in Venezuela, the war with Iran, and talk of taking over Cuba or even Greenland.
Trump cares above all about appearing strong. His worldview is simple: might makes right.
And the more easily he can deploy the military, the easier it becomes to use it again.
Trashing international law, alliances, and global institutions is not really the goal.
It’s simply collateral damage in his pursuit of self-aggrandizement.
Most of the political arguments I end up having with people come down to a difference between looking at the big picture or the small picture.
People who focus only on Israel’s immediate security, for example, are happy with the war with Iran. They see weapons depots destroyed, military infrastructure damaged, leaders assassinated — and they count those as victories.
But that’s the small picture.
They’re looking at the battles, not the war.
They aren’t thinking about the broader ramifications for regional stability, for international alliances, or even for Jews living in the diaspora.
Big picture, bombs are replaceable. Leaders are replaceable. Even armies are replaceable.
What isn’t easily replaced is stability.
Or trust.
Or credibility.
Once those are gone, they take generations to rebuild.
No comments:
Post a Comment